Notes from Friends

Friends of Skagit County September 2004

Looking To The Future June Kite, President Skagit County announced an open period for citizens to participate in the process to update the Comprehensive Plan for 2005 as required. Carrie Youngquist, Friends of Skagit County board member has been appointed to the Citizen’s Advisory Committee as well as Ellen Gray, who will represent 1000 Friends of Washington. Anyone can submit comments and recommendations to the Planning Department. Why 2005 Is Important. -- How Skagit County will look ten to twenty years from now depends on how we grow. Cities expand and rural lands disappear OR cities use undeveloped lands within the urban growth areas and rural lands remain valuable resource lands of farms and forests. All of Skagit County is governed by the County Comprehensive Plan and inter-local agreements with individual cities. The Comp Plan of 1996, adopted in 1997 with its development regulations, contained the goals and policies to be used until the next update. Planning for the future depends on population projections. One goal adopted by agreement with cities was to have 80% of new population in the incorporated cities with 20% in the rural areas.

Critical Choices Ellen Bynum, Director Thanks for the warm welcome I received when I assumed the director position in July. As many of you already know, I have lived in Skagit County since 1981 and worked on various land use issues including GMA and farmland preservation. I see Friends as a leading citizen group in Skagit County and will work with you toward preserving the rural character we all value. As we move into the fall harvest season and prepare for 2005, Friends of Skagit County is renewing its commitment to preventing sprawl, preserving Skagit County’s rural lands and working with communities to promote sensible growth management. We have a great opportunity to create an updated Comprehensive Plan that strengthens the laws that protect Skagit County with the 2005 Comp Plan update process. Rural lands, zoned agriculture, rural reserve and rural resource, make up 182,321 acres of Skagit County. The current law could permit a minimum of 17,066 developments. If these are allowed to proceed, we can rename the valley Kent II. Land Use Designations & Acreages (Chapter 4-3) Zoning Total Acres Size Use # Developments Resource Ag 94,930 40A min. 1/40* 2373 Rural Resource 27,850 10A min. 4/40*** 2785 Rural Reserve 59,540 10 acre 2/10*** 11,908 Totals Acres 182,321 Possible developments 17,066** *CaRD for co-housing **Additional developments allowed using CaRD *** permitted with CaRD You all know the urgency of the situation. Every month as you drive along Fir Island, out to Edison or up river, you can see new houses. Every house represents an acre that will never again be available for agriculture or forest production. Some of the houses are built on lots that were created 30 years ago. The County’s Farmland Legacy program can purchase these rights off of agricultural land, if it has enough money. The challenge is whether we can purchase enough rights fast enough to stop the loss of our rural lands. Continued on page 2 ¨

Inside This Issue
1	Looking To The Future; Critical Choices
2	Cause for Concern: Reviewing Forest Lands; New Board Members
3	2004 Challenge Grant, FOSC Annual Meeting, Welcome Back, Ellen Gray!
4	Bits & Pieces; Comments & Testimony
5	2005 Comp Plan Update Action; Legal Fund; Fall Art Show & Sale

“In the end, our society will be defined not only by what we create but by what we refuse to destroy.” John Sawhill

Cause for Concern –continued from page 2 The CAC met only once, in January 2004. Plans were laid for monthly meetings due to the urgency of the results, but not a single meeting followed. Members of the CAC expressed their initial thoughts at the only meeting and wrote up their comments which were submitted to the county. The consultant accurately summarized the comments in a following product but their recommendations to the county restated their own views, omitting member comments. The CAC stressed that if the designation criteria should change at all, it should only be tweaked. Perhaps the most important issue is the concept of ownership blindness. It appears the consultant would like to down zone large landowners, both private and state, and up zone ‘smaller’ landowners’. This view is not only biased, it has been struck down at every venue the issue has been discussed; including the original Forest Resource Advisory Committee (a unanimous vote) and later the Planning Commission. By creating an ownership bias, in-holdings throughout Skagit County could be developed and large landowners would be motivated to fracture their properties into smaller parcels endowed with more development rights. The big winner would be surveyors and developers, which happens to be the business of the hired consultant. The ‘consulting’ is not over. Presumably we are now moving into a new Phase 3 which deals with Policy Development, Alternatives Testing and Code Development. Some CAC members are quite concerned that the CAC could ultimately be seen as rubber stamping something they do not support. Time will tell.

Friends of Skagit County

Annual Meeting

Saturday, November 13^th, 2004 – 5 pm to 7 pm

WSU – Mount Vernon Research Station, Memorial Highway, Mount Vernon, WA.

5 pm Annual Meeting; 6 pm Keynote address

Keynote Speaker - Allison Deets Program Director, Skagit Co. Farmland Legacy Program.

Please invite your friends and neighbors to come and learn how they can help save Skagit County’s farmland.